These days we hear much of a return to nuclear power in Italy, and I think it says a lot of inaccuracies.
In 1987 Italy was voted in a referendum that abolished the nuclear in this country, politicians who are in favor of nuclear power plants argue that the outcome of that referendum was packed in a strong way the tragedy of Chernobyl, and many Italians rode the wave of fear and decided as a result, these politicians today that reasoning is no longer valid, since this was done with a central old old technologies, we are now central to the third generation risk does not exist, the most ever in their view, this would be non-polluting clean energy and compare it to the one created by the "energy plants", I wonder how the Minister Scajola and the UDC leader Casini, have not yet been awarded the Nobel Prize to physics, and as their many other managers or businessmen disguised as politicians argue that all these theories based on nothing, you probably have an advantage staff because everything they say there is nothing scientific. Economically
build nuclear power stations is not convenient for several reasons, first is a uranium fuel in 35 \\ 40 years runs out, the construction of a single central coast from 5000 to 7000 billion €, and then comes the need for banks to fund this project, in Italy would be needed for a region, bearing in mind that the beginning of construction until they are closed, there will range from 10 \\ 15 years, and then blessed these third-generation plants will have become outdated exist because those fourth-generation plus all these will only serve to cover 7% of domestic needs, not to mention the risk factor, it is because the safety of the plants is calculated based on a game of chance, then those who argue that there is no likelihood of accidents, says a misstatement, then there is the problem of waste disposal, all over the world there is only one secure site where you put them.
Someone will tell you that in France thanks to nuclear energy is cheaper, and that is the ideal solution for the French energy plan, in fact, all costs covered by the cost of maintaining nuclear weapons, and the 59 plants present cover only 20% of French needs, and to cool the reactors is need a lot of water, France uses 40% of its water resources, as if he understood a few years ago there was a hot summer and thus passed away the water, and other reactors had to be turned off, the elderly found themselves without power to run air conditioners, and some of them failed to pass the summer.
In Central America the last was built in 1979, President Zapatero of Spain said that by 2011 all nuclear power stations will close, the way to go is the use of renewable energy, no pollution, produce low cost energy For example, because the sun is available to everyone, but above all it clean energy, Germany, thanks to solar energy produces 17% of its needs, and thinking this was certainly not think of the sun, here in Italy than in the sun we could use the wind and the motion of the sea, we could create so much energy that it can export, so we are no longer strongly dependent as we are now.
In conclusion I believe the way forward is that of renewable energy, and not that of nuclear power plants, LNG terminals and "energy plants", both harmful and unnecessary.
0 comments:
Post a Comment